LOUD WHEN HUNGRY, SILENT WHEN FED – SALASYA AND THE POLITICS OF CONVENIENCE
By EoK Editorial:
Mumias East MP Peter Salasya’s recent political missteps, reckless rhetoric, and shifting alliances paint a familiar picture in Kenyan politics, one where leaders cry foul when they feel sidelined but grow silent when their personal interests are secured. His removal from the National Assembly’s Departmental Committee on Regional Integration triggered an outburst louder than his advocacy for the pressing economic struggles facing his constituents. His response, laced with accusations against Raila Odinga and President William Ruto, exposed what many have come to expect from career politicians: self-preservation over service.
Prioritizing Personal Interests Over Public Welfare
Salasya’s reaction to his committee ouster was swift and bitter. Rather than focus on the plight of the ordinary mwananchi suffering under high taxation and economic downturns, he turned his energy toward lamenting his lost seat, one that benefits him personally more than it does the people of Mumias East. From insulting ODM party leader Raila Odinga and now the "Luo" community. This episode lays bare the classic behavior of politicians who make noise when they feel politically disadvantaged but become eerily quiet when their personal fortunes improve. Would Salasya be that loud if given the Chair of Budget and Appropriations Committee?
Reckless Rhetoric and Tribal Undertones
Beyond his political positioning, Salasya's online presence has been a source of controversy. His actions even on live sessions, unfiltered statements, some bordering on tribal sentiments, seems to have alienated voters and heightened political tensions. At a time when Kenya’s youth-led "tribeless" movement is reshaping political engagement, Salasya, often referring to himself as "Boy Gen Z," his rhetoric stands in stark contrast, fueling divisions rather than fostering unity. His association with impeached former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, a figure often accused and reffered to a Tribal Master, raises further questions about his ideological direction and Gachagua's hand in Salasya's hate on a certain tribe.
On Salasya's Social Accounts, he's likely suggesting tribal war between his Luhya Community and their neighbors, The Luo. Something Mudavadi has spoken against.
The Dangers of Political Intolerance
Salasya’s physical assault at Nyayo Stadium was an unfortunate reminder of the consequences of political intolerance. While violence is unacceptable, his case also serves as a cautionary tale for leaders who fail to exercise restraint in their speech. His open endorsement of political aggression in the past came full circle, demonstrating that when politicians encourage intolerance, they, too, can fall victim to the same hostility. It is a lesson that should resonate with leaders who celebrate attacks on opponents only to cry foul when they find themselves on the receiving end.
![]() |
Hon. Peter Salasya slaps an MCA at a past event. |
Youth Mobilization: A Tool or a Threat?
The role of youth in political discourse cannot be overlooked. However, their mobilization for violent confrontations, whether out of loyalty or financial incentives, is a dangerous trend. The real question remains—does attacking opponents truly show unwavering support, or is it merely a desperate means to survive in a broken system? If Kenyan youth are to drive meaningful change, they must reject being used as pawns in the self-serving games of politicians.
Lessons from Salasya’s Political Journey
Salasya's trajectory offers a sobering reflection on the perils of unchecked ambition, reckless speech, and political convenience. His case is a reminder that leaders must balance personal aspirations with responsible leadership. Prime Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi, in condemning the Nyayo Stadium attack, emphasized the importance of unity and constructive engagement in Kenya’s democracy. His words should serve as a wake-up call, not just to Salasya but to all leaders who exploit division instead of fostering national cohesion.
As Kenya navigates a changing political landscape, citizens must remain vigilant against leaders who ride on public frustrations only to abandon their cause once their interests are met. The ultimate question remains: Are our politicians fighting for the people, or simply for a seat at the high table?
Comments
Post a Comment
Editing to the best version!